Re-reading this. ( )

16th

(3.5 / 5)

I read this book as a sophomore in high school, 22 years ago. I remember it being one of the easier-to-read classics of my 3 years of Honors English. All I really remembered about it, though, is the basic premise of book burning, the parlor screens, and a vague creepy idea of the Mechanical Hound. After reading it again now, I'm actually surprised that I remember it as a "simple" read, due to the writing style and a plethora of metaphors, but it does probably make a difference when you're pushed to analyze it after reading each third. I didn't dissect it for symbolism and analyze every paragraph like I did other classics, though, and I still have the short papers I wrote for assignments about it. It was fun to read those again after reading the book.

As an adult, I see the book differently than I did back then. For one thing, I have come to realize that the book is not about the censorship involved in book burning. The fire captain makes it clear that society turned from books long before it became illegal to own them. Rather, the technology that led them to that point seems to be what is being demonized. I suppose it's a call to make sure we don't let it take over our lives.

Though to be honest, I think there's a mixed message here, because despite the explanation the captain gives, it's also clear that the government doesn't want the people thinking for themselves. Wants them distracted while they're about to go to war--why and with whom, we never know. And due again to the writing style, I am not sure I understand what happened at the very end regarding the war.

I would say a strong theme, which is perhaps more relevant today, is the control the government is able to exert over the people. If the majority of society decides it doesn't care about books, then those people just don't read books. Why does that have to lead to books becoming illegal? The government decides that it needs to regulate the people's "fun" and oppose the potential of anyone offending anyone else at all, and apparently the people let it happen. Especially considering how recently Faber was a professor at a liberal arts school, it's amazing how quickly it must have happened.

One thing that I was absolutely correct about in remembering this book was how creepy the Mechanical Hound is. I actually had some unpleasant dreams the night in between the two days it took me to read the book this week, and the Hound was a highlight. (I don't have specific memories of the dreams, but a general understanding that they were related to the book.) It's seriously disturbing.

In the end, for me, at least, this book doesn't hold up as the classic it's hailed as. It's not a bad story, but I don't know that it's worth studying or holding up as a warning. Between this and Ender's Game, maybe I'm just not a fan of classic sci-fi. ( )

I haven't intentionally read and reread the lines in any book as much as I have in this one. Bradbury really haunts me. I've been reading his short story collection recently, and they reach somewhere very deep within you and wring you out. Fahrenheit 451 will always be one of those reads that i keep coming back to, both for revision and references in the time to come. ( )

7/10 ( )