Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... A Clockwork Orange (1962)by Anthony Burgess
Best Dystopias (10) » 109 more 501 Must-Read Books (52) Unread books (29) Books Read in 2023 (26) Best Crime Fiction (30) Short and Sweet (29) 1960s (6) Metafiction (25) Unreliable Narrators (22) Favourite Books (533) Top Five Books of 2014 (189) music to my eyes (11) Futurism Works (4) 1,001 BYMRBYD Concensus (148) Big Jubilee List (7) Top Five Books of 2016 (628) Books I've Read (3) Books Read in 2022 (1,052) Folio Society (443) Science Fiction (6) Books Read in 2015 (2,085) Books Read in 2020 (2,425) Authors from England (49) Books Read in 2014 (1,494) Five star books (728) Read (92) Books Read in 2011 (11) The Greatest Books (80) Allie's Wishlist (5) United Kingdom (74) Books Tagged Abuse (39) Must read (15) Libertarian Books (73) My Favourite Books (41) Favourite Books (21) 2005-2010 (3) Teens (7) Fave Books (10) um actually (75) To Read (2) Speculative Fiction (12) Books tagged unread (12) Books About Boys (166) Fiction For Men (97) Best Satire (185) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.
Full version of the book as originally written by Burgess. This book is amazing in its language and story. ( ) This edition is the one that was originally published in the United States without the last chapter of the book because apparently Americans didn't need to have a happy ending tacked on? But Burgess didn't like that it was cut, or that the movie was made based on this version. I love this book, but not the edit that was made to this version. Throughout my reading, I felt there was some message I should be getting from what was otherwise a set of otherwise slightly related incidents. Real horrorshow? 3.9/5 A classic that has sat on my shelf much too long, and one that I think in some ways I had built up in my mind as being something detestable and likely unpleasant to read. However, while the subject matter and goings-on are shocking, dirty deeds are not nearly as prominent as I was expecting and are in some ways lightly veiled by our "humble narrator"'s adopted whimsical language: a near futuristic-slang that derives its terms from a mix of Russian and Cockney-rhyming. Initially disorientating, it becomes considerably easier to read as you go, many phrases having light shed by context. Some are harder to "viddy" than others, but regardless it's all part of the experience and gives the book an oddly poetic charm that may not have been quite so present (or stomachable) had the gross acts of sexual violence been described with sole use of the English dictionary. A Clockwork Orange sometimes gets dangerously close to being preachy but never dives nose deep into such territory. Its commentary on youth culture, violence and freedom of choice is relatively blatant, without being too explicit. The fact that for two decades this remained published only in truncated form in the US (where it saw most success) is a sad thing, and the fruit of this is most interesting. The novel has 21 chapters divided into three parts with seven chapters each. The very last chapter was what was excluded, messing with the clearly intentional numeracy and providing the novella with an entirely different outlook; the difference is pessimism vs. optimism - the latter of which Burgess was shooting for, the former being what Kubrick emphasised in his film, being based on the truncated version of the book (although, even Burgess' more "positive" ending is bittersweet). I am yet to watch the film, but I will have to now for curiosity and comparison. I am not sure whether or not I prefer a version of A Clockwork Orange with or without its original closing sentiment, but I feel it's important to preserve an author's original intent (not to discount other versions being made available). Reading the introduction to this edition, it seems Burgess got a very poor deal financially when giving the rights for Kubrick's adaptation, and it must have been a hard thing to not only receive practically nothing, but to witness an inaccurate portrayal of his vision gain such widespread acclaim (both in terms of the film's long-term success, and the lack of availability in the US of the "right" version of his novella until 1986). I put moloko in my chai for about a week after reading this.
Mr. Burgess, whenever we remeet him in a literary setting, seems to be standing kneedeep in the shavings of new methods, grimed with the metallic filings of bright ideas. A Clockwork Orange, for example, was a book which no one could take seriously for what was supposed to happen in it-its plot and "meaning" were the merest pretenses-but which contained a number of lively notions, as when his delinquents use Russian slang and become murderous on Mozart and Beethoven. In a work by Burgess nothing is connected necessarily or organically with anything else but is strung together with wires and pulleys as we go. Burgess’s 1962 novel is set in a vaguely Socialist future (roughly, the late seventies or early eighties)—a dreary, routinized England that roving gangs of teenage thugs terrorize at night. In perceiving the amoral destructive potential of youth gangs, Burgess’s ironic fable differs from Orwell’s 1984 in a way that already seems prophetically accurate. The novel is narrated by the leader of one of these gangs-—Alex, a conscienceless schoolboy sadist—and, in a witty, extraordinarily sustained literary conceit, narrated in his own slang (Nadsat, the teenagers’ special dialect). The book is a fast read; Burgess, a composer turned novelist, has an ebullient, musical sense of language, and you pick up the meanings of the strange words as the prose rhythms speed you along. A Clockwork Orange, the book for which Burgess — to his understandable dismay — is best known. A handy transitional primer for anyone learning Russian, in other respects it is a bit thin. Burgess makes a good ethical point when he says that the state has no right to extirpate the impulse towards violence. But it is hard to see why he is so determined to link the impulse towards violence with the aesthetic impulse, unless he suffers, as so many other writers do, from the delusion that the arts are really rather a dangerous occupation. Presumably the connection in the hero’s head between mayhem and music was what led Stanley Kubrick to find the text such an inspiration. Hence the world was regaled with profound images of Malcolm McDowell jumping up and down on people’s chests to the accompaniment of an invisible orchestra. It is a moot point whether Burgess is saying much about human psychology when he so connects the destructive element with the creative impulse. What is certain is that he is not saying much about politics. Nothing in A Clockwork Orange is very fully worked out. There is only half a paragraph of blurred hints to tell you why the young marauders speak a mixture of English and Russian. Has Britain been invaded recently? Apparently not. Something called ‘propaganda’, presumably of the left-wing variety, is vaguely gestured towards as being responsible for this hybrid speech. But even when we leave the possible causes aside, and just examine the language itself, how could so basic a word as ‘thing’ have been replaced by the Russian word without other, equally basic, words being replaced as well? But all in all, “A Clockwork Orange” is a tour-de-force in nastiness, an inventive primer in total violence, a savage satire on the distortions of the single and collective minds. In A Clockwork Orange, Anthony Burgess has written what looks like a nasty little shocker but is really that rare thing in English letters—a philosophical novel. The point may be overlooked because the hero, a teen-age monster, tells all about everything in nadsat, a weird argot that seems to be all his own. Nadsat is neither gibberish nor a Joycean exercise. It serves to put Alex where he belongs—half in and half out of the human race. Belongs to Publisher SeriesIs contained inHas the adaptationIs abridged inInspiredHas as a studyThe fictional universe in four science fiction novels: Anthony Burgess's "A Clockwork Orange," Ursula Le Guin's "The Word for World is Forest," Walter Miller's "A Canticle for Leibowitz," and Roger Zelazny's "Creatures of Light and Darkness." by Sam Joseph Siciliano Has as a commentary on the textHas as a student's study guide
Told through a central character, Alex, the disturbing novel creates an alarming futuristic vision of violence, high technology, and authoritarianism. A modern classic of youthful violence and social redemption set in a dismal dystopia whereby a juvenile deliquent undergoes state-sponsored psychological rehabilitation for his aberrant behavior. No library descriptions found.
|
Popular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
W.W. NortonAn edition of this book was published by W.W. Norton. Penguin Australia4 editions of this book were published by Penguin Australia. Editions: 0141182601, 0141037229, 0141192364, 0241951445 |